On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:05:03PM +0200, Felix Geyer wrote: > So I think the check should be changed from > \S+/bin/moc-qt[45] > to something like > \S+/bin/moc(?:-qt[45])?
Hello Felix, Thank you for your report. I too noticed this yesterday but forgot to commit/push my changes. It's fixed in 6bd8ae [1]. On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 02:05:51PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > This could possible be generalized to: > > \S+/bin/moc\b Hello Jari, I already had Felix's idea committed, so I pushed that one. If qt keeps the .../qt?/bin/moc "style", it shouldn't cause any issues when they update to e.g. qt6. > Simon, let me know when to pull, Please pull ;-) - and thanks again for your quick uploads. Regards Simon [1]: https://ruderich.org/simon/gitweb/?p=blhc/blhc.git;a=commit;h=6bd8ae07ae91c53c36d219975bc3296b7af81045 -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
