Hi,
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 15:06 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/06/13 14:16, Michele Cane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 13:41 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 04/06/13 13:16, Michele Cane wrote:
> >>>> sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
> >>>
> >>> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >>> libharfbuzz0a{ab}
> >>> The following packages will be upgraded:
> >>> libpango-1.0-0 libpango1.0-0 libpangocairo-1.0-0 libpangoft2-1.0-0
> >>> libpangoxft-1.0-0
> >>> 5 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> >>> Need to get 1,362 kB of archives. After unpacking 689 kB will be used.
> >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >>> libharfbuzz0a : Breaks: libharfbuzz0 but 0.9.17-4 is installed.
> >>
> >> Right there is the problem. libharfbuzz0a breaks/replaces (and rightfully
> >> does
> >> so) libharfbuzz0. That should be fine, aptitude should resolve to uninstall
> >> libharfbuzz0. Do you have something installed that depends on libharfbuzz0
> >> other
> >> than pango? What happens if you say No to aptitude's proposed solution?
> >> Does it
> >> offer another option that is satisfiable (i.e. that will remove
> >> libharfbuzz0 but
> >> not half of your system). Keep saying No until aptitude finds the right
> >> solution.
> >>
> >
> > All the options proposed by aptitude are the one that I posted in my
> > previous mail and non of the is satisfactory.
> > Probably is due to the gnome packages that I have installed from
> > experimental.
>
> Could be. Try
>
> aptitude remove libharfbuzz0
>
> and paste the output. That should tell us what is holding it back.I Installed libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 from experimental and fixed the problem. Thank you for the help. Cheers Mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
