[ CC'ing Daniel Glassey as co-maintainer ] Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:45:43AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:07:33PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > I can temporariky use internal clucene, but that gives problems on arm*, > > so I would like to avoid that... > > Actually the problems on arm seems to be gone so I can do > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b26be8c9226832141c7fdcc337c395c8ac09d80;hp=48aeda3b4eefd295a37d4bf49f2344390006bf95 > and thus I can do > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commitdiff;h=202e24523462f4603690e9005bd06f97c795310d;hp=3b26be8c9226832141c7fdcc337c395c8ac09d80 > > but I would prefer to have this embeeded code copy uses as short > as possible... Now even some months later: is there any progress? And be it a upload with a new source package? (As binary packages differ anyway?) That wouldn't break r-deps but cause LO to be "sanely" built. I don't really want an other external (3.6.x upto 4.0.x in experimental) -> internal (4.0.x in sid) -> external (4.1.x in experimental, _right now_) -> internal (4.1.x in unstable) game The last "real" answer was in May: #debian-devel.05-06.log:18:03 < _rene_> fabo: ping? :) #debian-devel.05-06.log:21:21 -!- fabo_ [[email protected]] has joined #debian-devel #debian-devel.05-06.log:21:26 -!- fabo [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:42 -!- fabo_ is now known as fabo #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:42 < _rene_> fabo: ping? (sorry for nagging, but a simple answer would be nice) #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:44 < fabo> _rene_: sorry, I'm on vacation :) I tried to be away form the screen... #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:44 < _rene_> fabo: mmh, ok :) #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:45 < _rene_> fabo: you know what I am aiming at, though? :) #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:45 < fabo> _rene_: yes :) I'll get it done this week #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:45 < _rene_> fabo: the upload on Thursday (already built) will use internal clucence, but that's only ... cool :) #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:46 < _rene_> fabo: new source package I assume? or proper transition? (not that it matters much except NEW, but..) #debian-devel.05-07.log:15:56 < fabo> _rene_: dunno yet. not sure all reverse build-dep can switch to the new lib. need to check. Or should I just NMU it (as a new source package) into unstable? Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
