On 2013-07-11 12:43, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Ack, thanks for the patch! To be honest I have no experience with > module-assistant at all, so I've pretty much just taken your patch > as-is (committed to git now, will make an upload shortly).
> IIRC Aron's rationale for changing it to linux-any instead of all (I > prefer the latter as well) is that bbswitch is only supported on > linux. I kind of find the point moot, since I doubt that many of the > dkms packages in debian today work on kfreebsd, and that if we wanted > to make bbswitch installable on archs where it would actually be used, > "Architecture: i386 amd64" would be a better choice (I don't think > nvidia optimus is supported on non-Intel archs). maybe armhf, too, at least the proprietary driver gained another supported architecture with the latest release (in experimental). > bbswitch is small enough that xz wouldn't make any difference, and > that also makes it harder to backport. backporting m-a is planned :-) Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org