On Wednesday 17 July 2013 02:30 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't quite understand this fix:
>
>>    * [05ff2e6] Update libnl build dependency to version 3 family
>>      (Closes: #688161)
> The patch I posted (from upstream) did remove any libnl dependency. So
> it seems rather odd replacing that with libnl3 instead.
> Am I missing something?
>
> Michael
>

Sorry. I didn't pay attention to any patch. I just packaged the new
upstream tag.

I should have read your bug report closely. Based on what you've stated,
then I need to drop the libnl dependency completely. My question to
upstream stands invalid then.

-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to