On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 11:48 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > While this can be overlooked on normal systems, it obviously has huge > effects on the LDAP server performances, since my passwd database > contains hundreds of thousands of entries. > > I do not know why the issue was not evident with libnss-ldap too, maybe > Arthur knows more about this part.
Are you saying there is a significant performance difference when running "getent passwd" (or running proftpd) in your environment between libnss-ldap and libnss-ldapd? If so, please open a bugreport against nss-pam-ldapd. I can't think of a reason for proftpd to do anything different between libnss-ldap and libnss-ldapd as they both implement the exact same API. -- -- arthur - [email protected] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
