#include <hallo.h>
* Luca Capello [Mon, Oct 31 2005, 08:57:26PM]:
> Hello!
> 
> On Mon 31 Oct 2005 16:33 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> > On Sun 30 Oct 2005 22:34 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >> Oh damn, not script trouble again. Please apply the attached patch
> >> to /etc/vpnc/vpnc-script.conf . If that does not work, please add
> >> "set -x" to the second line of that script, run vpnc in a "script"
> >> session.  Please tell me the result and send me the log created by
> >> script in the second case.
> <cut>
> > Anyway, I'm going to manually apply the patch at line 102 of my
> > vpnc-script and see what happens.
> 
> Nothing changed, attached the log :-(
> 
> AFAIK, my configuration script is still valid: I haven't receive any
> mail from the University and in the University website there are still
> the same config options.

Interesting. It is not your university's config, it is in your routing
configuration, _before_ you connect. Look:

++ ip route get 192.33.214.142
++ fix_ip_get_output
++ sed 's/cache//;s/metric [0-9]\+ [0-9]\+//g'
+ /sbin/ip route add 192.33.214.142 via 10.64.64.64 dev ppp0 src 10.122.28.127 
mtu 1500 advmss 1460 hoplimit 64
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable

So what do "ip route show" and "ip route get 192.33.214.142" before you
connect?

And this one is more confusing:
+ ifconfig tun0 inet 129.194.216.16 pointopoint 129.194.216.16 netmask 
255.255.255.255 mtu 1390 up
...
+ /sbin/ip route add default dev tun0
RTNETLINK answers: No such device

How does that happen? Misconfigured SELinux setup?

Eduard.

-- 
A guard: I don't watch TV. It's a cultural wasteland filled with inappropriate
metaphors and an unrealistic portrayal of life created by the liberal media
elite.
                                                 -- Quotes from Babylon 5 --

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to