On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 01:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > Samuel Bronson wrote: > > Since libgdb.a has been dropped upstream, we've dropped libgdb-dev > > entirely now, and fp is going to need to come up with a different plan > > for debugger support. > > > Personally I tend to think we should just embed an appropriate version > of the libgdb source in the fpc source package. The debian policy on > embedded libraries is only a "should not" not a "must not" and I don't > see any significant security exposure in doing so.
I'd prefer to have is as a separate source package. But I'm also fine to drop gdb support from IDE (that was the case for 2 years) and just push users for using Lazarus (we can maybe add a message about that). Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
