On 07/29/2013 02:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-07-29 17:27:26)
For going to do this work but liblcms2 is really a shame about ABI/API
compatibilty. See:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html
So be prepared to ask for a so dump.
Thanks for raising attention to this.
@Oleksandr: Please strongly consider using a symbols file to a) fail
when symbols are removed and b) have consumers of this library (like
ghostscript and krita) automagically handle symbols added.
...instead of leaving it to downstream FTBFS to reveal breakage really
belonging in liblcms.
Regards,
- Jonas
Hi Jonas,
I'll definitely add a symbols file before the next upload of 2.5. Thanks
a lot for exploring the compatibility issues.
I already made a functional lcms2-2.5 package that has been used to
build other packages, but I still have to apply the patches for security
advisories and generally polish the package up to the debian/main standards.
Regards,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
