Il 08/08/2013 22:53, Sergei Golovan ha scritto:
> Why "tcl-snack | tcl-snack-alsa" is bad for you?

Because all the programs that use snack will have to add all the backends as 
alternatives, in order to support them.
Right now there are only two backends and there has not been any activity 
upstream since a long time, so it is unlikely that there will be any other 
backends in the near
future, but the situation may change.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to