control: reopen -1 Hi Bastian,
Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> writes: > Thanks. I'm closing the bug, because systemd is broken. I will add a > conflict in the near future. Bastian, excuse my blunt words, but this is a stupid choice. Are you seriously saying that Debian is the only distribution where users can’t have lvm and a modern init system, just because you don’t like how upstream does things nowadays? I am not giving up on this so easily, and, if necessary, will raise this all the way up to the ctte. I’ll ask you one more time: please just ship the generator, which has no side-effects for non-systemd users and makes booting work for systemd users. >> > There is no udev.service in the upstream systemd source. In the Debian >> > package it is a symlink to systemd-udevd.service. >> Yes, as you noticed, the upstream name is systemd-udevd. > > No. udev != systemd-udevd. I don’t understand what you mean here. udev upstream has renamed the udev binary to systemd-udevd. Why would they not be equal? -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
