Hi, On Mittwoch, 4. September 2013, Norbert Preining wrote: > Yes, and? Was the dist-upgrade disturbed? > We are talking about normal systems, that is having telxive or texlive-full > installed. Not pathological cases of only t-l-d installed.
wheezy has: Package: texlive-lang Binary: texlive-lang-african, texlive-lang-arabic, texlive-lang-armenian, texlive-lang-cjk, texlive-lang-croatian, texlive-lang-cyrillic, texlive-lang- czechslovak, texlive-lang-danish, texlive-lang-dutch, texlive-lang-finnish, texlive-lang-french, texlive-lang-german, texlive-lang-greek, texlive-lang- hebrew, texlive-lang-hungarian, texlive-lang-indic, texlive-lang-italian, texlive-lang-latin, texlive-lang-latvian, texlive-lang-lithuanian, texlive- lang-mongolian, texlive-lang-norwegian, texlive-lang-other, texlive-lang- polish, texlive-lang-portuguese, texlive-lang-spanish, texlive-lang-swedish, texlive-lang-tibetan, texlive-lang-english, texlive-lang-vietnamese, texlive- lang-all, ptex-bin sid has: Package: texlive-lang Binary: texlive-lang-african, texlive-lang-arabic, texlive-lang-cjk, texlive- lang-cyrillic, texlive-lang-czechslovak, texlive-lang-english, texlive-lang- european, texlive-lang-french, texlive-lang-german, texlive-lang-greek, texlive-lang-indic, texlive-lang-italian, texlive-lang-other, texlive-lang- polish, texlive-lang-portuguese, texlive-lang-spanish, texlive-lang-all, ptex- bin, thailatex which other binary packages build by texlive-lang do you consider "pathological to use"? > I *can* provide transitional packages to make it nice for the user > experience. I don't remember a requirement in the Debian policy for that. #569219 and #323066 suggest this is a best practice for years. https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition might be helpful too. cheers, Holger, who considers just to build-depend on texlive-lang-all | and be done with this
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
