On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:17 PM, YunQiang Su <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Osamu Aoki <[email protected]> wrote: >> Package: ibus-googlepinyin >> Version: 0.1.2-1 >> Severity: normal >> >> As upstream state in: >> https://code.google.com/p/libgooglepinyin/ >> >> This is "prove concept project" and asking: >> >> | If you are interested in full featured pinyin input method, please try >> | libpinyin or sunpinyin, they are both supported by fcitx and ibus. They >> | use more advanced algorithm (2-gram vs this project's unigram) and >> | support more feature, like Shuangpin, Zhuyin, Fuzzy Pinyin and so on. >> | Thank you. > yes, it is. >> >> This is a good candidate for removal. > googlepinyin has better quality for its collection of words. > So I don't think it should be removed. If it protect ibus transaction, it can be removed. While if it can work with ibus 1.5 with just a rebuild, I suggest that we stay it in Debian. >> >> If you think I am wrong, please speak up. >> >> Osamu >> >> PS: This removal leave me with ibus-el for the last user of python-ibus >> >> -- System Information: >> Debian Release: jessie/sid >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pkg-ime-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ime-devel > > > > -- > YunQiang Su
-- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
