Before the 3.25-1 version upload, I included a fix for the duplication in the rules file according to your suggestion and to what is documented in in [1].
Test build logs yielded the info, generated from the upstream configure script, that the executables are configure: progs: FreeFem++-nw bamg cvmsh2 FreeFem++-mpi ffmedit ffglut I wrongly thought that the FreeFem++ executable was not generated and that the duplication had been dealt with by upstream. Hence I commented out the relevant lines in the rules file. Shortly I will upload a new 3.25-2 version which I hope will fix the problem. Best regards Dimitris [1] dedup Wiki[1] Στις Πεμ 12 Σεπτ 2013 07:58:01 Helmut Grohne έγραψε: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 freefem++/3.25-1 > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:06:14PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > #701161: freefem++: /usr/bin/FreeFem++ and /usr/bin/FreeFem++nw are the > > same files > > > > It has been closed by Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos <[email protected]>. > > > > freefem++ (3.25-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > > > > [ Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos ] > > * Imported Upstream version 3.25 (Closes: #701161 #706714) > > It is not clear to me in what way the new upstream version fixes an > issue in the packaging. In any case the reported issue is fully present > as can be seen on the updated dedup report[1]. Did you mistake this bug > number for another? > > I already gave a command to be added to debian/rules as a proposed > solution. Has that been insufficient for some reason? > > Helmut > > [1] http://dedup.debian.net/compare/freefem++/freefem++ -------- [1] https://wiki.debian.org/dedup.debian.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
