2013/9/13 Felipe Sateler <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Dan S <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ah, that's useful. Actually, though, I don't believe porting is >> required. The yaml-cpp website says that the old 0.3 API "will >> continue to be supported, and will still receive bugfixes", and debian >> has libyaml-cpp0.3 available everywhere. > > In debian, the 0.3 package is built from the same sources, so it is > bound to go away at some point. The headers also do not match the 0.3 > version. I tried building using system yaml-cpp but it failed.
Using system yaml-cpp 0.3, as implemented in my commit? Curious - worked for me. I don't see why 0.3 is bound to go away in the medium-term, given that their upstream is so loud about keeping it. But I don't mind either way - if you think, then we should reverse my commit. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
