On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 13:07 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 September 2013 09:05 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Currently APT's auto-removal criteria are very conservative; it will
> > not remove any package where another package has any level of
> > dependency on it (Depends, Recommends or Suggests).  This includes
> > cases where the dependency is on a virtual package that is also
> > provided by multiple packages - none of them can be removed.
> >
> > To allow auto-removal of linux-image-* packages, nothing should
> > depend on/recommend/suggest the virtual package 'linux-image'.
> 
> Hello Ben,
> 
> systemtap would like to have the linux-image dbg packages available, for
> full functionality. Currently there's no virtual package for it.
> Would it make sense to introduce a virtual -dbg package ?

This would result in the same sort of problem.  But I could add a
metapackage built from linux-latest, so that the -dbg package gets
updated at each ABI change.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Humans are not rational beings; they are rationalising beings.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to