On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:42:47 +0100 Dominic Hargreaves <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could you say what you need from a newer libscalar-list-utils-perl > package? Depending on what the issue is, we could consider changes in > perl-base. This bug report can serve to track better solutions to the > problem too; but I don't see an easy fix. Ah I see.. that is an awkward bug. I'm upstream maintainer of List::Util (and in fact Socket, which was also mentioned in the other bug) - so quite often I find it useful to have the latest version of it installed in order to test that it doesn't break things, or to use the feature I just added. I generally prefer to keep everything under dpkg control, rather than CPANning extra ones in, though for now as a workaround I can do just that to have a later version installed. Is there anything I could do upstream to help the situation? -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [email protected] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
