Hi, (adding Samuel to CC)
Robert Millan <r...@debian.org> writes: > On 15/10/2013 09:33, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: >> When we first discovered that both packages ship sdt.h I changed >> systemtap-sdt-dev from arch:all to arch:linux-any. Now it seems this >> perhaps complicated the situation unnecessarily. Do you think we could >> set it back to arch:all and then just add a >> conflicts:kfreebsd-kernel-headers? > You can't conflict with kfreebsd-kernel-headers, it's a Build-Essential > package! > > I'm not familiar with SystemTap. For what I can see, it looks like a > very Linux-specific package. Is there any point in providing it for > kfreebsd-*? see the following part in Samuel's original bug report: "Until now, I've been reluctant to suggest this because systemtap-sdt-dev wasn't available on all arches, so it would be necessary to add it as a build-dependency for only some arches, which would involve hard-coding the list of arches systemtap builds on in the control files for those packages. (This also prevents use on kfreebsd, hurd, or any arch that might be supported in GDB before it is supported in systemtap.)" -- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726248 -Timo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
