Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > tags 328749 patch > >> > thanks > >> > > >> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from > >> >> experimental installed: > >> > > >> > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for > >> > explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, > >> > or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? > >> > >> I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if > >> you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use > >> the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted > >> and close #336666, too. > > > > Hi, > > > > I'll take care of of both bugs. > > That's very good. Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is > one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to > fmtutil-sys. We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility > hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while. On the other > hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing. > > I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages > that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll > remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing.
Ok, I'll patch the patch. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
