On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so > > > without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't > > > know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-( > > > > You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the > > xsl:template. > > Yeah I know that, but in my case it's uglier than before. I have an > ignore stylesheet which defines high priority templates to override some > specific templates ... but the criteria to define "the specificity" > includes this variable. > > This ignore stylesheet is used by several other stylesheet. I have to > put dozens of xsl:if in several stylesheets when 3 generic templates did > the work until now.
Maybe you can hack something with modes ? Well, that depends on how your stuff is done... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
