tags 727611 +wontfix
thanks
On 25 October 2013 at 04:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
| Control: reopen -1
|
| Am 25.10.2013 04:05, schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| >
| > On 24 October 2013 at 17:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
| > | Package: ggobi
| > | Version: 2.1.10-4
| > | Severity: wishlist
| > |
| > | ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34). If there
any
| > | pointers for such a port ... or build ggobi without graphviz support.
| > |
| > | see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 for the build log.
| >
| > One more follow-up: Not only does this build cleanly on Debian as shown by
| >
| > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ggobi
| >
| > it also just build cleanly again in my chroot. I'd be happy to share the
| > build log.
|
| see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ggobi/2.1.10-4build1/+build/5154829
|
| Debian still has graphiz-2.2x. There is a reason I did file this as a wishlist
| issue.
Well that is sort of silly. For as long this builds on Debian I am not going
to do anything, realistically. Let me know when a new / updated graphviz hits
Debian.
And I say this as a heavy Ubuntu user -- with maybe a dozen machines between
home and work. But my workflow _for Debian_ is still the same, and if you
insist that Ubuntu ("downstream") has to differ than this is really an issue
for patches at your end (as you've done, doing your users a disservice by
removing the GraphLayout plugin) and not something I can do.
Dirk
--
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
