Package: kfreebsd-10 Version: 10.0~svn257123-1 Severity: important See:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=243023 Given that MAXLOGNAME is mirrored in <bits/param.h> and available to userland, this opens a few questions: - Does the new ABI create any security concerns? E.g. buffer overflows in userland. - Should we update MAXLOGNAME in glibc? Would we need wrapper code in order to preserve compatibility with 9.x in case we did that? - Do we need to patch the kernel in order to preserve backward compatibility with old userland? (e.g. Wheezy chroot) -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
