On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Michael Meskes <mes...@debian.org> wrote: > clone 730855 -1 > assign -1 acpi-fakekey > thanks > >> But acpi-fakekey isn't, so this means acpi-support is not installable on any >> architecture that isn't listed there. > > So why did you not report it against acpi-fakekey then? > > Anyway, I guess there is indeed a bug in acpi-support. The dependency on > acpi-fakekey is to strong. The package is of quite some use without it. >
MIPS architectures do have ACPI support, and I agree the bug report should go with acpi-fakekey. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
