Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> writes:

> Thanks for fixing this with the 3.0.5-1 upload. Could you please also
> prepare packages for squeeze-security and wheezy-security? I did
> already had a look at wheezy today, attached is proposed debdiff (but
> not yet tested apart the testsuite).

I've prepared:

 * varnish_2.1.3-8+deb6u1 for squeeze-security

 * varnish_3.0.2-2+deb7u1 for wheezy-security

Debdiffs attached:

diff -Nru varnish-3.0.2/debian/changelog varnish-3.0.2/debian/changelog
--- varnish-3.0.2/debian/changelog	2012-05-01 16:22:42.000000000 +0200
+++ varnish-3.0.2/debian/changelog	2013-12-09 00:48:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+varnish (3.0.2-2+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
+
+  * Import upstream security patch.
+    A malformed request could in some configurations lead to Varnish
+    crashing.  CVE-2013-4484 (Closes: #728989)
+
+ -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[email protected]>  Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:36:59 +0100
+
 varnish (3.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Knut Arne Bjørndal ]
diff -Nru varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/0001-Make-up-our-mind-Any-req.-we-receive-from-the-client.patch varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/0001-Make-up-our-mind-Any-req.-we-receive-from-the-client.patch
--- varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/0001-Make-up-our-mind-Any-req.-we-receive-from-the-client.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/0001-Make-up-our-mind-Any-req.-we-receive-from-the-client.patch	2013-12-09 00:48:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+From 6de534b7096879890ac152537c87551fda204944 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Martin Blix Grydeland <[email protected]>
+Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:48:20 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Make up our mind:  Any req.* we receive from the client with
+ fundamental trouble gets failed back without VCL involvement.
+
+Fixes	#1367
+---
+ bin/varnishd/cache_center.c      | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
+ bin/varnishd/cache_http.c        |  2 +-
+ bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
+ create mode 100644 bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc
+
+diff --git a/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c b/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
+index 4d94d88..190aeaf 100644
+--- a/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
++++ b/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
+@@ -1453,9 +1453,12 @@ DOT start -> recv [style=bold,color=green]
+ static int
+ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ {
+-	uint16_t done;
++	uint16_t err_code;
+ 	char *p;
+-	const char *r = "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_100 = "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_400 = "HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_413 = "HTTP/1.1 413 Request Entity Too Large\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_417 = "HTTP/1.1 417 Expectation Failed\r\n\r\n";
+ 
+ 	CHECK_OBJ_NOTNULL(sp, SESS_MAGIC);
+ 	AZ(sp->restarts);
+@@ -1478,10 +1481,14 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ 	sp->wrk->vcl = NULL;
+ 
+ 	http_Setup(sp->http, sp->ws);
+-	done = http_DissectRequest(sp);
++	err_code = http_DissectRequest(sp);
+ 
+ 	/* If we could not even parse the request, just close */
+-	if (done == 400) {
++	if (err_code == 400)
++		(void)write(sp->fd, r_400, strlen(r_400));
++	else if (err_code == 413)
++		(void)write(sp->fd, r_413, strlen(r_413));
++	if (err_code != 0) {
+ 		sp->step = STP_DONE;
+ 		vca_close_session(sp, "junk");
+ 		return (0);
+@@ -1493,12 +1500,6 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ 	/* Catch original request, before modification */
+ 	HTTP_Copy(sp->http0, sp->http);
+ 
+-	if (done != 0) {
+-		sp->err_code = done;
+-		sp->step = STP_ERROR;
+-		return (0);
+-	}
+-
+ 	sp->doclose = http_DoConnection(sp->http);
+ 
+ 	/* XXX: Handle TRACE & OPTIONS of Max-Forwards = 0 */
+@@ -1508,13 +1509,14 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ 	 */
+ 	if (http_GetHdr(sp->http, H_Expect, &p)) {
+ 		if (strcasecmp(p, "100-continue")) {
+-			sp->err_code = 417;
+-			sp->step = STP_ERROR;
++			(void)write(sp->fd, r_417, strlen(r_417));
++			sp->step = STP_DONE;
++			vca_close_session(sp, "junk");
+ 			return (0);
+ 		}
+ 
+ 		/* XXX: Don't bother with write failures for now */
+-		(void)write(sp->fd, r, strlen(r));
++		(void)write(sp->fd, r_100, strlen(r_100));
+ 		/* XXX: When we do ESI includes, this is not removed
+ 		 * XXX: because we use http0 as our basis.  Believed
+ 		 * XXX: safe, but potentially confusing.
+diff --git a/bin/varnishd/cache_http.c b/bin/varnishd/cache_http.c
+index 844e71b..b96fb22 100644
+--- a/bin/varnishd/cache_http.c
++++ b/bin/varnishd/cache_http.c
+@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ http_splitline(struct worker *w, int fd, struct http *hp,
+ 	hp->hd[h2].e = p;
+ 
+ 	if (!Tlen(hp->hd[h2]))
+-		return (413);
++		return (400);
+ 
+ 	/* Skip SP */
+ 	for (; vct_issp(*p); p++) {
+diff --git a/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc b/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc
+new file mode 100644
+index 0000000..e1de20a
+--- /dev/null
++++ b/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc
+@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
++varnishtest "blank GET"
++
++server s1 {
++	rxreq
++	txresp
++} -start
++
++varnish v1 -vcl+backend { 
++	sub vcl_error {
++		return (restart);
++	}
++} -start
++
++client c1 {
++	send "GET    \nHost: example.com\n\n"
++	rxresp
++	expect resp.status == 400
++} -run
++
++client c1 {
++	txreq -hdr "Expect: Santa-Claus"
++	rxresp
++	expect resp.status == 417
++} -run
++
++client c1 {
++	txreq
++	rxresp
++	expect resp.status == 200
++} -run
+-- 
+1.8.4.rc3
+
diff -Nru varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/series varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/series
--- varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/series	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-3.0.2/debian/patches/series	2013-12-09 00:48:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# debian/source/git-patches exported from git by quilt-patches-deb-export-hook
+0001-Make-up-our-mind-Any-req.-we-receive-from-the-client.patch
diff -Nru varnish-3.0.2/debian/source/git-patches varnish-3.0.2/debian/source/git-patches
--- varnish-3.0.2/debian/source/git-patches	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-3.0.2/debian/source/git-patches	2013-12-09 00:48:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# Security patch for varnish 3.0.2 cherry-picked from 3.0.5
+# http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728989
+
+upstream/3.0.2...patches/3.0.2-CVE-2013-4484
diff -Nru varnish-2.1.3/debian/changelog varnish-2.1.3/debian/changelog
--- varnish-2.1.3/debian/changelog	2013-12-09 00:40:13.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-2.1.3/debian/changelog	2013-12-09 01:19:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+varnish (2.1.3-8+deb6u1) squeeze-security; urgency=high
+
+  [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
+  * Backport upstream security patch.
+    A malformed request could in some configurations lead to Varnish
+    crashing.  CVE-2013-4484 (Closes: #728989)
+
+ -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[email protected]>  Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:19:45 +0100
+
 varnish (2.1.3-8) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Fix random secret creation on non-Linux kernels (Closes: #596373)
diff -Nru varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8 varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8
--- varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8	2013-12-09 00:42:11.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,206 +0,0 @@
-Description: Upstream changes introduced in version 2.1.3-8
- This patch has been created by dpkg-source during the package build.
- Here's the last changelog entry, hopefully it gives details on why
- those changes were made:
- .
- varnish (2.1.3-8) unstable; urgency=high
- .
-   * Fix random secret creation on non-Linux kernels (Closes: #596373)
-   * Urgency "high" due to FTBFS RC bug during squeeze freeze
- .
- The person named in the Author field signed this changelog entry.
-Author: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[email protected]>
-Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/596373
-
----
-The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
-checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
-are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:
-
-Origin: <vendor|upstream|other>, <url of original patch>
-Bug: <url in upstream bugtracker>
-Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/<bugnumber>
-Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/<bugnumber>
-Forwarded: <no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded>
-Reviewed-By: <name and email of someone who approved the patch>
-Last-Update: <YYYY-MM-DD>
-
---- varnish-2.1.3.orig/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
-+++ varnish-2.1.3/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
-@@ -1096,9 +1096,11 @@ DOT start -> recv [style=bold,color=gree
- static int
- cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
- {
--	int done;
-+	uint16_t err_code;
- 	char *p;
--	const char *r = "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n";
-+	const char *r_100 = "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n";
-+	const char *r_400 = "HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request\r\n\r\n";
-+	const char *r_417 = "HTTP/1.1 417 Expectation Failed\r\n\r\n";
- 
- 	CHECK_OBJ_NOTNULL(sp, SESS_MAGIC);
- 	AZ(sp->restarts);
-@@ -1121,10 +1123,12 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
- 	sp->wrk->vcl = NULL;
- 
- 	http_Setup(sp->http, sp->ws);
--	done = http_DissectRequest(sp);
-+	err_code = http_DissectRequest(sp);
- 
- 	/* If we could not even parse the request, just close */
--	if (done < 0) {
-+	if (err_code == 400)
-+		(void)write(sp->fd, r_400, strlen(r_400));
-+	if (err_code != 0) {
- 		sp->step = STP_DONE;
- 		vca_close_session(sp, "junk");
- 		return (0);
-@@ -1136,12 +1140,6 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
- 	/* Catch original request, before modification */
- 	HTTP_Copy(sp->http0, sp->http);
- 
--	if (done != 0) {
--		sp->err_code = done;
--		sp->step = STP_ERROR;
--		return (0);
--	}
--
- 	sp->doclose = http_DoConnection(sp->http);
- 
- 	/* XXX: Handle TRACE & OPTIONS of Max-Forwards = 0 */
-@@ -1151,13 +1149,14 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
- 	 */
- 	if (http_GetHdr(sp->http, H_Expect, &p)) {
- 		if (strcasecmp(p, "100-continue")) {
--			sp->err_code = 417;
--			sp->step = STP_ERROR;
-+			(void)write(sp->fd, r_417, strlen(r_417));
-+			sp->step = STP_DONE;
-+			vca_close_session(sp, "junk");
- 			return (0);
- 		}
- 
- 		/* XXX: Don't bother with write failures for now */
--		(void)write(sp->fd, r, strlen(r));
-+		(void)write(sp->fd, r_100, strlen(r_100));
- 		/* XXX: When we do ESI includes, this is not removed
- 		 * XXX: because we use http0 as our basis.  Believed
- 		 * XXX: safe, but potentially confusing.
---- varnish-2.1.3.orig/bin/varnishtest/tests/v00014.vtc
-+++ varnish-2.1.3/bin/varnishtest/tests/v00014.vtc
-@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
- 
- test "Check req.backend.healthy"
- 
-+# probe will hit this to check healthiness
- server s1 {
- 	rxreq
- 	expect req.url == "/"
-@@ -16,8 +17,8 @@ varnish v1 -vcl {
- 		.max_connections = 1;
- 		.probe = {
- 			.url = "/";
--			.timeout = 1s;
--			.interval = 1s;
-+			.timeout = 0.1s;
-+			.interval = 0.1s;
- 			.window = 3;
- 			.threshold = 2;
- 			.initial = 0;
-@@ -33,25 +34,33 @@ varnish v1 -vcl {
- 	}
- } -start
- 
-+# probe runs every 0.1s and needs 2 (threshold) out of the latest 3 (window) to
-+# be successful. Make sure this does *not* happen: the first probe would be
-+# successful (s1 was started and finished), but let the next one or two to fail
-+# (and hence making the backend unhealthy) by idling.
-+server s1 -wait
-+delay 0.3
-+
-+# verify that backend is unhealthy as expected
- client c1 {
- 	txreq
- 	rxresp
- 	expect resp.status == 500
- } -run
- 
--server s1 {
--	rxreq
--	expect req.url == "/"
--	txresp -body "slash"
--} -start
-+# now let three consecutive probe checks to succeed by starting them and
-+# waiting for them to finish. This will lead varnish to believe that the
-+# backend is healthly. (note that s1 ports are reused)
-+server s1 -repeat 3 -start -wait
- 
--server s1 {
-+# do an actual check with a healthy backend, expecting to get a 200 back
-+server s2 {
- 	rxreq
- 	expect req.url == "/foo"
- 	txresp -body "foobar"
- } -start
- 
--client c1 {
-+client c2 {
- 	txreq -url "/foo"
- 	rxresp
- 	expect resp.status == 200
---- /dev/null
-+++ varnish-2.1.3/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc
-@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-+varnishtest "blank GET"
-+
-+server s1 {
-+	rxreq
-+	txresp
-+} -start
-+
-+varnish v1 -vcl+backend { 
-+	sub vcl_error {
-+		return (restart);
-+	}
-+} -start
-+
-+client c1 {
-+	send "GET    \nHost: example.com\n\n"
-+	rxresp
-+	expect resp.status == 400
-+} -run
-+
-+client c1 {
-+	txreq -hdr "Expect: Santa-Claus"
-+	rxresp
-+	expect resp.status == 417
-+} -run
-+
-+client c1 {
-+	txreq
-+	rxresp
-+	expect resp.status == 200
-+} -run
---- varnish-2.1.3.orig/doc/changes-2.1.0-2.1.1.xml
-+++ varnish-2.1.3/doc/changes-2.1.0-2.1.1.xml
-@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
- 
-     <change type="enh">
-       <para><code>varnishsizes</code>, which is
--      like <code>varnishhost</code>, but for the length of objects,
-+      like <code>varnishhist</code>, but for the length of objects,
-       has been added..</para>
-     </change>
-   </subsystem>
---- varnish-2.1.3.orig/doc/changes-2.1.1.html
-+++ varnish-2.1.3/doc/changes-2.1.1.html
-@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
-     <ul>
-       <li>
-         <p><span class="code">varnishsizes</span>, which is
--      like <span class="code">varnishhost</span>, but for the length of objects,
-+      like <span class="code">varnishhist</span>, but for the length of objects,
-       has been added..</p>
-       </li>
-     </ul>
diff -Nru varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8+deb6u1 varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8+deb6u1
--- varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8+deb6u1	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.1.3-8+deb6u1	2013-12-09 01:20:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+Description: Upstream changes introduced in version 2.1.3-8+deb6u1
+ This patch has been created by dpkg-source during the package build.
+ Here's the last changelog entry, hopefully it gives details on why
+ those changes were made:
+ .
+ varnish (2.1.3-8+deb6u1) squeeze-security; urgency=high
+ .
+   [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
+   * Backport upstream security patch.
+     A malformed request could in some configurations lead to Varnish
+     crashing.  CVE-2013-4484 (Closes: #728989)
+ .
+ The person named in the Author field signed this changelog entry.
+Author: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[email protected]>
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/728989
+
+---
+The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
+checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
+are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:
+
+Origin: <vendor|upstream|other>, <url of original patch>
+Bug: <url in upstream bugtracker>
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/<bugnumber>
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/<bugnumber>
+Forwarded: <no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded>
+Reviewed-By: <name and email of someone who approved the patch>
+Last-Update: <YYYY-MM-DD>
+
+--- varnish-2.1.3.orig/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
++++ varnish-2.1.3/bin/varnishd/cache_center.c
+@@ -1096,9 +1096,11 @@ DOT start -> recv [style=bold,color=gree
+ static int
+ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ {
+-	int done;
++	uint16_t err_code;
+ 	char *p;
+-	const char *r = "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_100 = "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_400 = "HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request\r\n\r\n";
++	const char *r_417 = "HTTP/1.1 417 Expectation Failed\r\n\r\n";
+ 
+ 	CHECK_OBJ_NOTNULL(sp, SESS_MAGIC);
+ 	AZ(sp->restarts);
+@@ -1121,10 +1123,12 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ 	sp->wrk->vcl = NULL;
+ 
+ 	http_Setup(sp->http, sp->ws);
+-	done = http_DissectRequest(sp);
++	err_code = http_DissectRequest(sp);
+ 
+ 	/* If we could not even parse the request, just close */
+-	if (done < 0) {
++	if (err_code == 400)
++		(void)write(sp->fd, r_400, strlen(r_400));
++	if (err_code != 0) {
+ 		sp->step = STP_DONE;
+ 		vca_close_session(sp, "junk");
+ 		return (0);
+@@ -1136,12 +1140,6 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ 	/* Catch original request, before modification */
+ 	HTTP_Copy(sp->http0, sp->http);
+ 
+-	if (done != 0) {
+-		sp->err_code = done;
+-		sp->step = STP_ERROR;
+-		return (0);
+-	}
+-
+ 	sp->doclose = http_DoConnection(sp->http);
+ 
+ 	/* XXX: Handle TRACE & OPTIONS of Max-Forwards = 0 */
+@@ -1151,13 +1149,14 @@ cnt_start(struct sess *sp)
+ 	 */
+ 	if (http_GetHdr(sp->http, H_Expect, &p)) {
+ 		if (strcasecmp(p, "100-continue")) {
+-			sp->err_code = 417;
+-			sp->step = STP_ERROR;
++			(void)write(sp->fd, r_417, strlen(r_417));
++			sp->step = STP_DONE;
++			vca_close_session(sp, "junk");
+ 			return (0);
+ 		}
+ 
+ 		/* XXX: Don't bother with write failures for now */
+-		(void)write(sp->fd, r, strlen(r));
++		(void)write(sp->fd, r_100, strlen(r_100));
+ 		/* XXX: When we do ESI includes, this is not removed
+ 		 * XXX: because we use http0 as our basis.  Believed
+ 		 * XXX: safe, but potentially confusing.
+--- varnish-2.1.3.orig/bin/varnishtest/tests/v00014.vtc
++++ varnish-2.1.3/bin/varnishtest/tests/v00014.vtc
+@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
+ 
+ test "Check req.backend.healthy"
+ 
++# probe will hit this to check healthiness
+ server s1 {
+ 	rxreq
+ 	expect req.url == "/"
+@@ -16,8 +17,8 @@ varnish v1 -vcl {
+ 		.max_connections = 1;
+ 		.probe = {
+ 			.url = "/";
+-			.timeout = 1s;
+-			.interval = 1s;
++			.timeout = 0.1s;
++			.interval = 0.1s;
+ 			.window = 3;
+ 			.threshold = 2;
+ 			.initial = 0;
+@@ -33,25 +34,33 @@ varnish v1 -vcl {
+ 	}
+ } -start
+ 
++# probe runs every 0.1s and needs 2 (threshold) out of the latest 3 (window) to
++# be successful. Make sure this does *not* happen: the first probe would be
++# successful (s1 was started and finished), but let the next one or two to fail
++# (and hence making the backend unhealthy) by idling.
++server s1 -wait
++delay 0.3
++
++# verify that backend is unhealthy as expected
+ client c1 {
+ 	txreq
+ 	rxresp
+ 	expect resp.status == 500
+ } -run
+ 
+-server s1 {
+-	rxreq
+-	expect req.url == "/"
+-	txresp -body "slash"
+-} -start
++# now let three consecutive probe checks to succeed by starting them and
++# waiting for them to finish. This will lead varnish to believe that the
++# backend is healthly. (note that s1 ports are reused)
++server s1 -repeat 3 -start -wait
+ 
+-server s1 {
++# do an actual check with a healthy backend, expecting to get a 200 back
++server s2 {
+ 	rxreq
+ 	expect req.url == "/foo"
+ 	txresp -body "foobar"
+ } -start
+ 
+-client c1 {
++client c2 {
+ 	txreq -url "/foo"
+ 	rxresp
+ 	expect resp.status == 200
+--- /dev/null
++++ varnish-2.1.3/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01367.vtc
+@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
++test "blank GET"
++
++server s1 {
++	rxreq
++	txresp
++} -start
++
++varnish v1 -vcl+backend { 
++	sub vcl_error {
++		return (restart);
++	}
++} -start
++
++client c1 {
++	send "GET    \nHost: example.com\n\n"
++	rxresp
++	expect resp.status == 400
++} -run
++
++client c1 {
++	txreq -hdr "Expect: Santa-Claus"
++	rxresp
++	expect resp.status == 417
++} -run
++
++client c1 {
++	txreq
++	rxresp
++	expect resp.status == 200
++} -run
+--- varnish-2.1.3.orig/doc/changes-2.1.0-2.1.1.xml
++++ varnish-2.1.3/doc/changes-2.1.0-2.1.1.xml
+@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
+ 
+     <change type="enh">
+       <para><code>varnishsizes</code>, which is
+-      like <code>varnishhost</code>, but for the length of objects,
++      like <code>varnishhist</code>, but for the length of objects,
+       has been added..</para>
+     </change>
+   </subsystem>
+--- varnish-2.1.3.orig/doc/changes-2.1.1.html
++++ varnish-2.1.3/doc/changes-2.1.1.html
+@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
+     <ul>
+       <li>
+         <p><span class="code">varnishsizes</span>, which is
+-      like <span class="code">varnishhost</span>, but for the length of objects,
++      like <span class="code">varnishhist</span>, but for the length of objects,
+       has been added..</p>
+       </li>
+     </ul>
diff -Nru varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/series varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/series
--- varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/series	2013-12-09 00:42:11.000000000 +0100
+++ varnish-2.1.3/debian/patches/series	2013-12-09 01:20:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-debian-changes-2.1.3-8
+debian-changes-2.1.3-8+deb6u1
-- 
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to