On Nov 08, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems extreme for someone who has a static ip address & has set the > > SMTP HELO to match the rDNS for that ip. Given that this is > > *precisely* what is suggested by the relevant RFCs I'm slightly > > peeved! > I'm seeing 4.7 here, nowhere near 7.7.
X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on wonderland.linux.it X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR autolearn=no version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Report: * 3.8 HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (DHCP) * 3.9 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr * 1) * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature