On Jan 5, 2014 2:39 AM, "Russ Allbery" <r...@debian.org> wrote: > I'm doubtful that either of us are going to convince the other on this > point. I don't consider it comparable to the other examples you're > citing, and I think it's inobvious that raise(SIGSTOP) is a good technical > choice. Simple, yes, but that's not the same thing.
How hard would it be to write an external wrapper that converts the systemd style socket activation to the SIGSTOP protocol (for upstart invoking a systemd compatible daemon)? Or to add support to start-stop-daemon for both protocols so a reliable sysv style script is trivial for more modern daemons? Cheers, aj
