On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 23:06:23 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:08:18 +0000 Stuart Prescott wrote: > > > There has been some further discussion and suggestions on how this could be > > handled in the short term and also in the longer term in the following > > thread: > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/2013q1/004907.html > > Can we make some progress on this bug?
Is there any progress on this bug? > I don't know much about colorimetry and ICC profiles, but I would > really like to see this issue solved. [...] > > It seems to me that one suggestion is to use > compatibleWithAdobeRGB1998.icc or sRGB.icc from the icc-profiles-free > package [1]. > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/2013q1/004931.html > > Can this work correctly? Can this be done? I seem to understand that Fedora fixed the corresponding issue (mentioned in [2]) by replacing [3] the non-free profiles with the ones found in their package named "icc-profiles-openicc". That Fedora package [4] seems to (more or less) correspond to the Debian package named icc-profiles-free [5], which is under the zlib license [6]. Please correct me, if I am wrong. Could this same strategy work for Debian, as well? Please let me know. Thanks for your time! [2] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52704#c21 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848659#c3 [4] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/icc-profiles-openicc.git/tree/icc-profiles-openicc.spec?id=0652ad3fb090415dae5fb956972fe738f7738f09 [5] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/icc-profiles-free [6] http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/i/icc-profiles-free/unstable_copyright -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpXeAhJBODJF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
