ok - done, 0.7.1-2 went into neurodebian, wheezy users should become happier ;) cheers
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: > all good for me. > I'll let you know when we merge the PR with the py 2.6 fixes. > I'll then backport and tag 0.7.2 > thanks > Alex > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko > <deb...@onerussian.com> wrote: > > ok -- while "support 2.6" actions are cooking I thought it would be > > worthwhile to reupload to NeuroDebian a build without 2.6. > > Would there be objections if I push to git the following commit and upload > > generated packages to NeuroDebian. Marked changelog as 'neurodebian' since > > that is where it is intended to go and makes no sense for unstable i.e. > > proper > > Debian upload > > $> git show > > commit e1d70152267aedf2ba7f4f5be167d53854d5b2c2 > > Author: Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> > > Date: Sun Jan 12 10:03:16 2014 -0500 > > Boost X-Python-Version to >= 2.7 to provide installable builds for > > wheezy > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > > index b23aa17..c7f2b36 100644 > > --- a/debian/changelog > > +++ b/debian/changelog > > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > > +python-mne (0.7.1-2) neurodebian; urgency=low > > + > > + * Boost X-Python-Version to >= 2.7 to provide installable > > + builds for wheezy > > + > > + -- Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:02:56 > > -0500 > > + > > python-mne (0.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > [ Alexandre Gramfort ] > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > > index b85808a..5ab70eb 100644 > > --- a/debian/control > > +++ b/debian/control > > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > > Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/python-mne.git > > Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/python-mne.git > > Homepage: http://martinos.org/mne > > -X-Python-Version: >= 2.6 > > +X-Python-Version: >= 2.7 > > Package: python-mne > > Architecture: all > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: > >> or may be you would prefer to adjust that one to stay 2.6 compatible? > >> I guess that would be better as it should stay compatible with 2.6 ... � > >> it's a mistake on our side... I'll setup a jenkins on 2.6 to avoid this > >> issue > >> in the future. > >> � > >> also for testing, I am usually trying to test with all supported > >> versions, which could help point out other possible 2.7 dependencies. > >> ATM you are testing only for current version... (in Debian sid it is > >> 2.7 > >> only but in older ones ,multiple) > >> ok -- let me cook up testing first, see if there is anything else TODO > >> for 2,6 support, if not much then I would wait on your thoughts first > >> thanks for your help > >> Alex > >> � > > -- > > Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. > > http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org > > Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. > > Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 > > Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 > > WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org