Le Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:14:41 +0100, Guido Günther <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:08:58AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > [..snip..] > > I'm not sure what you mean here. I don't think any changes on the > > LSB initscript is required here. > > > > Renaming the .service file back to the original and adding a symlink > > that matches the name of the initscript should be enough. > > We'd e.g. still have /etc/default/libvirt-bin used to configure the > libvirtd service. THe package will also still be named libvirt-bin > so I wonder if it wouldn't be more consistent to leave the service > file as and add a > > Alias=libvirtd I think it's a general good habit to keep the upstream file untouched. And I don't think that the alias in this case is good (Alias= is lost in case the service is disabled), a symlink will be needed anyway. > so firewalld and others can reference it. I'm o.k. with renaming the > whole package from libvirt-bin -> libvirtd in the future including > unit files and init scripts but that's nothing I have time for atm. > > Patches to achieve this (and especially testing) would be welcome. OK I'll add this to my todo list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
