Simon Pepping [2014-01-14 11:33 +0100]: > A number of applications depend on libudev.so.0, e.g. Google Chrome. > These applications solve the problem by creating a link libudev.so.0 > -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1. Many users are affected by such > failures, and on the web there are many questions about the problem. > > It would be better if the package libudev1 installs such a link.
No, that would be a dangerous hack. There is a reason why the soname got bumped, as libudev1 removed a few obsolete symbols. Surely they are not likely to be used, but if an application does, and it would link to libudev.so.1 thinking it was libudev.so.0 it would crash. For those third-party applications I suggest either bundling libudev.so.0 or providing a libudev0 package along with it. I'm not an authoritative maintainer of udev in Debian, but I suggest to "wontfix" this. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
