This was just some overzealous lintian cleanup and I'll fix it in the next upload.
* Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org) wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > The newest version removes the version from gpg-idea conflict so that > > the package is removed. > > I also was surprised about this seemingly baseless change and wondered > what's the reason behind it. > > From the changelog entry of 2.0.22-3: > > * debian/control: Remove version on gpg-idea conflict, add missing > Breaks for gpgsm and convert Conflicts to Breaks for gpgv2. > > The git commit at > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/eric/gnupg2.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca7d62c2 > gives no reason either. > > It would be nice if you would at least explain why you made this > obviously controversial change. > > If there's no technical reason, I'd be happy if you would revert that > change with the next upload -- to allow people to continue to decide > themselves if they want/need/can use gpg-idea or not. > > Regards, Axel -- Eric Dorland <e...@kuroneko.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature