Le jeudi 30 janvier 2014 à 22:43 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev a écrit : > > https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#sysvinit_.2B-_insserv
Since you forgot to paste the first sentence, let me add it here. “Sysvinit was never designed to cope with the dynamic/event-based architecture of the current Linux kernel. The only reason why we still use it today is the cost of a migration.” > Is this all? Yes, this is all. Anyone who knows how Linux works doesn’t consider sysvinit a viable choice today. There is no need for lengthy argumentations, because there is nothing to argue against. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
