On Friday, January 31, 2014 15:21:53 Robert Edmonds wrote: > Chris Knadle wrote: > > severity 737246 grave > > thanks > > > > > It's probably related to #736801 I guess. > > > > Unfortunately this is not related to #736801 as best I can tell; > > recompiling mumble locally with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-7 has the same result. > > This means mumble is currently borked. :-( > > > > -- Chris > > In that case, it looks like my changes in 2.5.0-6 / -7 are just broken.
Yes -3 and -5 work, -6 / -7 do not. However concerning the changes made to fix #736801 (build failures on ia64 and sparc), as of Wednesday (2014-01-29) it was announced in [debian-devel-announce] that ia64 and sparc are no longer release architectures. sparc is apparently still using gcc-4.6 as the default compiler, and the kernel in stable does not work. This means that Britney will allow package migrations into Testing regardless if packages for these two architectures are broken. Today it was announced the ia64 architecture was removed from Testing, and is likely to be removed from Sid as well "soon". > Most likely we need to revert back to the approach in 2.5.0-5 but fix > the atomic code so that it works on the architectures with older default > gcc versions. I'll see if I can get that done in the next day or so. Issues with ia64 can be ignored now, and under the circumstances sparc is questionable. I think you have the option of using the 2.5.0-5 package "as it was" if you wish. I'm not trying to rush a fix here though -- I'm mainly mentioning this because I'm wondering from the maintainer point of view if the effort to patch the protobuf source specifically for these two architectures is worth the effort. Obviously I didn't know these architecture changes were coming when I filed #736801 on the 26th. ;-) Thanks. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
