On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:17:17AM -0500, Logan Rosen wrote: > Hey Mark,
Don't top post and try to avoid HTML e-mail as well. > The reason I disabled autoheader was because autoheader was failing during > autoreconf due to missing templates for certain macros. Since autoheader > isn't necessary here anyway, I disabled it per the instruction in > DH_AUTORECONF(1), which says to set the environment variable of any part of > autoreconf to "true" if you don't want it to be run (as it will just > execute "true" and move on). So why does your change set AUTOHEADER=1 then? > Per your point about the architecture, it has been > proposed<https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2013/09/msg00045.html>, > and libtool has been updated to support it in > Debian<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726404> > . > Hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any further > questions/requests for clarification. No, this does not for example answer my question about what the actual errors that are supposed to be being fixed are.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
