> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2014, 23:37 -0600 schrieb Peter Samuelson: > > What would you expect the software to say in a mixed-rev wc?
[Fabian Greffrath] > I don't know, I have never worked with such a repository (and my patch > only addresses the simple single-rev wc case). I doubt that. Mixed-rev working copies are the common case, not the exception. Almost every time you run 'svn commit', you get a mixed-rev wc. The files you commit are updated to the revision you committed, while the rest of the wc is not. To understand why this happens, consider 2 facts: - You are permitted to commit from an out-of-date wc, so long as the specific files you are committing are up to date; - 'svn commit' does not automatically run 'svn update'. > What does it say which revision it updated to in a mixed-rev wc? 'svn update' always updates to a single revision (HEAD by default, or you can specify a revision with -r), so it prints that single revision. (Well, except for externals, but those are handled separately, as though you were running 'svn update' individually for each external.) Of course you can update just a subset of the wc (e.g., 'svn update foo.txt'), to create a mixed-rev wc, but 'update' itself still only has a single target revision to report. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org