On 02/10/2014 11:11 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:11:28 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> When I add the 'fingerprint' directive to ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf (which >> additionally outputs the fingerprint for --list-keys etc.), mutt >> can't open encrypted mails anymore. > > Seems like 'with-fingerprint' (instead of 'fingerprint') does what I > want, i.e. show the fingerpringt with `gpg --list-* ...' on the > commandline and still allows decryption in mutt. > > /* > dkg: maybe this would be a worthwile update for > https://we.riseup.net/debian/openpgp-best-practices#update-your-gpg-defaults > */
Thanks, reading the man page and the source code for --with-fingperint
and --fingerprint, it seems that --with-fingerprint is slightly better
for the intended purpose than --fingerprint.
i still consider mutt to be broken if it can't handle "fingerprint" in
the user's gpg.conf, fwiw, but i've updated the openpgp best practices
document.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
