Hmm that would certainly explain my issues. Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 18, Sam Flory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Udev seems to ignore rules in 70-persistent-net.rules. If I fr example > put in 70-persistent-net.rules: > No, it does not. > As you can see, your rule has a different dev_id than the actual device: > > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", > ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:e1:fd:cf", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x1", ATTR{type}=="1", > KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="unused1" > > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", > ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:e1:fd:cf", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", > KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth4" > > -- > ciao, > Marco > -- The sender takes no responsibly for damage to hardware, clothing, or dignity as result of humorous content in this correspondence.
