On 2014-02-27 02:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> On 26 February 2014 at 15:51, Dejan Latinovic wrote:
> | 
> | [...]
> 
> I am confused. I have a pending change for the next R upload which has:
> 
>   * debian/control: Added "!mipsel" to the Build-Depends as OpenJDK 7 is 
>     not available here (cf emails with Niels Thykier in #727805)
> 
> This says we _exclude_ OpenJDK on mips and mipsel.  
> 
> Do, or don't we, have a Java Development version I can depend on mips(el) ?
> 
> Dirk
> 
> 
> | 
> | Regards,
> | Dejan
> | 
> 

Hi,

You and I came to the conclusion to disable OpenJDK on mipsel on the
18th of November (see #727805#42).  At that time, OpenJDK-7 failed to
build on mipsel and we wanted to remove OpenJDK-6.
  Then a month later, Adrian follows up in #727805#52 saying that "they"
are working on OpenJDK-7 for mips and mipsel.  You asked to be kept in
the loop (comment 62) and Adrian mails the bug on the 4th of Jan saying:

"""openjdk-7 is now available on both mips and mipsel."""


So you apparently have openjdk-7-jdk that you can depend on mips and
mipsel now, but you didn't in October.

Despite having removed Java support in rjava/0.9-6-1, you apparently
never asked the FTP masters to remove the rjava binaries on mipsel
(which is why you see an "out of date binaries" for mipsel)[1].
  As I see it, you can solve this in two ways; file the request and get
the binary removed /or/ re-enable java support on mipsel now that
OpenJDK-7 is available and have rjava compile there on mipsel.

My guess is that the mipsel porters will prefer that you did the latter
and personally I do not care which one you pick[2].  AFAICT re-adding
mipsel relies entirely on you whereas completing the mipsel removal
requires you to file a bug against the FTP masters and then waiting for
them to process it.  If you want rjava back in testing, re-adding mipsel
just might be the fastest option.

~Niels

[1] I mentioned this would be needed in comment 5 (and again in comment
32) of #727805 if you removed mipsel support.

[2] With rJava not being in testing, it is not blocking the removal of
OpenJDK-6 (from testing) any longer, so it is no longer a priority for me.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to