On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:42:12 +0100 Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> wrote:
> Quoting Antonio Ospite ([email protected]): > > Hi Cristian, > > > > from the updated po.it I see that you updated the templates on > > 2014-02-17 18:39+0100. > > > > When calling for translations could you please send the updated > > templates.pot to the bug report used to track the review? > > Or maybe I missed it? > > > I can but, indeed template.pot can be regenerated automatically with > "debconf-updatepo" once the debian/<foo>.templates file(s) are > updated. > It's true it can be regenerated, but having in the source package the very same one used the the "call for translations" makes sense, this way the POT-Creation-Date value can be used as unique identifier to check that the po files are against the right pot file. For example: grep POT-Cre *.po{t,} | cut -d ':' -f 2- | sort | uniq | wc -l must be equal to 1. > But, anyway, here it is. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
