On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 12:33:56AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> 
> Am Freitag, den 21.02.2014, 18:16 +0100 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> > 
> > My roadmap about this is something like:
> > 
> > a) On Sunday 1.22.0 reaches testing (#737515). 
> > b) Somewhere next week I plan to upload something to fix [#625278:
> >    dictionaries-common: package contains two dangling symbolic links in
> >    /usr/lib/ispell]. 
> > 
> >    While I consider this harmless and something that should be considered a
> >    false positive by any checking tool, I admit it is not nice. This suffers
> >    from the same "ro" problem as creating symlinks from autobuildhash 
> > scripts,
> >    and I plan deal with it similarly, here during main dpkg run while in
> >    triggers for the autobuildhash scripts. This has the advantage that will
> >    provide more testing.
> > c) By that time I plan to prepare an experimental package with all the new
> >    changes, to start further testing.
> 
> 
> The plan is to ask these people, for their feedback and input and
> eventually if they're ok to update the (simple) aspell-xx packages, if
> that leads to improvment for Devian archive. As an example, enabling
> auto-compat will also eliminate some nasty piuarts errors and debsums
> false positives. I think, with dh_aspell-simple now in place, many will
> be happy to make Debian better here, especially when provided with
> patches. 

Hi,

I think all the preliminary steps are done with 1.22.6 upload to sid. I have
also uploaded 1.23.0~exp1 to experimental including a different handling of
autobuildhash symlinks intended to stop shipping symlinks in package itself.

I have also uploaded to sid most of the dictionaries I am the only
maintainer. They use new substvars and got ready to be rebuilt against
1.23 once it is considered ready for sid. This should help finding pending
bugs in sid version. Unfortunately none of them is a basic aspell dict to
create a single aspell dict package, so they did not benefit from
aspell-simple.

Also built a small part of those dictionaries against experimental version
and uploaded to experimental,

iportuguese_20140211-2~exp1_all.deb
wportuguese_20140211-2~exp1_all.deb

igalician-minimos_0.5-37~exp1_all.deb
wgalician-minimos_0.5-37~exp1_all.deb
aspell-gl-minimos_0.5-37~exp1_all.deb

ifaroese_0.4.2-3~exp1_all.deb
wfaroese_0.4.2-3~exp1_all.deb
aspell-fo_0.4.2-3~exp1_all.deb
myspell-fo_0.4.2-3~exp1_all.deb

ispanish_1.11-6~exp1_all.deb
myspell-es_1.11-6~exp1_all.deb
aspell-es_1.11-6~exp1_all.deb

to test better the system.

> But IMHO that's the second step, the first is to let the
> people know that there are some changes (planned) and ask for testing,
> comments, concerns and maybe even ideas.

> But I think that can also wait a little until you give the "GO" telling that 
> you think everything is now stable enough.
> Just give me a ping e.g for testing...

I think we can start working on this,

I'd speak about

aspell-simple: To make things easier for people maintaining aspell
          dictionaries created from pristine aspell sources.

substvars: Good help for being in sync with dependencies.

autobuildhash symlinks: No longer shipped with the package but created by the
          autobuildhash script. A list of available symlinks is put in a
          .remove list to make sure they are removed fro mpostrm. Dangling
          symlinks are searched for and removed at the trigger run (this last
          may have been enough, but having .remove files does not harm).

as reasons to upgrade.

Suggestions for more points?

I have been working on these new uploads during this week and now would like
to have spare time for other things. Will try to find time to start
ellaborating on those points.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to