On March 6, 2014 07:29:31 AM Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Ok, can you then please sponsor a package for me? I can fix this bug, also > #740628 and push on mentors.
I can do that. Please send a follow-up to the bug when your work is ready. I (or another debian-med team member) will act on it. > > Is there some reason you can't use ITK v4? > > The main reason is: [...limited architectures...] > many packages that have been successfully built with the v3 won't build > anymore against v4, so the rationale is "use 4 on amd64 and i386, switch to > v3 for other archs". OK. But you do understand that in future this will no longer be an option because, at some point, v3 will be removed from the archive in favour of v4 that is now in Testing. > I don't know if you have an hint for building them against v4 (removing the > package from ftpmaster will let the package reach testing I know) If you want to build a package that requires ITK, at present you have two options: (a) build only for the two ITK-supported architectures, or (b) stay with v3. There's a discussion going on now in debian-med regarding a third option: restoring architectures to v4. Regards, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
