Hi! Arthur Marble <[email protected]> writes:
> Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang > (instead of gcc). I checked the patch, but it returns 2, while the comment above the function says that it should return 0 on failure, and it is used as such later. Returning 2 there will result in buggy behaviour. I'll change it to return 0, and upload a fixed version in a couple of hours. Thanks for the bug report and the effort! -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
