On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:07:46PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Steve, I took the liberty to CC since you have a good grasp on the M-A > stuff. Please have a look at [0]. Your input would be most welcome. > Please let me know if the suggestions above make sense, are complete > non-sense or if there is a better way to handle this.
Yes, your suggestions all make sense to me. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:37:30PM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote: > I will have a look at your proposed solution then. What we miss then is a > user that know about the limitations and want to have two different > versions installed but not used at the same time (as the binary name/path > would be the same). I don't see any reason why this would need to be supported. The answer to "which proxy do you use?" should always be "the one from the newest version of library that's available in Debian". If there's ever a concrete reason why this should *not* be the answer, you probably want to regard that as an upstream bug. Hope that helps, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
