On 03/13/2014 08:00 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 13, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think we should do that. Udev rules should only use a limited >> subset of groups which are guaranteed to exist. netdev is no such case. > We *cannot* use users/groups which are not in the default /etc/passwd > indeed, or annoying things will happen. > > I do not object in principle to having /dev/rfkill in group netdev (but > I do not know anything about how software rfkill is used), but the rule > must be shipped by a package which creates the group.
By grepping on my system, I see wicd-daemon, ifupdown and wpasupplicant trying to create the group netdev when missing, so there's no single package. Out of those, I would say netbase. If you think that's ok, could you re-assign the bug? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
