Hi, Silvio Rhatto wrote (18 Mar 2014 00:17:11 GMT) : > Em Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:29:12AM +0100, intrigeri escreveu: >> Great! Here's a quick code review of the changes since 0.2.9.
> Thanks for the review :) You're welcome. In the future, how about releasing a RC, issueing a call for reviews and tests, before going the full way to RFS? Congrats for the improvements. Only two minor glitches remain. I can now see: > - echo "Fatal: no such key $recipient on your GPG keyring." > + echo "Fatal: no such key $recipient on your OpenPGP keyring." ... but I'm not sure "OpenPGP keyring" makes any sense. Unless the OpenPGP standard defines this concept, I think "GnuPG keyring" would be more correct. >> > + gpg --batch --refresh-keys "$recipient" >> >> I'm not sure this really does what you mean here. At least the GnuPG >> manpage does not talk about it. Perhaps use --recv-keys for >> better clarity? Ping? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
