On Wednesday 12 March 2014 19:10:25 John David Anglin wrote: [snip] > >> I'm fully willing to make the contribution available under any "GNU > >> License Terms". > > > > Or BSD-license? Would that help? (Maybe not because of the copyright > > licensing?) > > I have no objection to this approach and could try to send a signed > email on the > weekend. It's something I've never done before.
OK, then let's try with an unsigned mail to this address (741190@...) stating that you put the patch under a BSD license. If we then get the requirement to get it signed we will see what to do. > I don't understand the copyright situation for these files. It is my > understanding > that Helge contributed the code that is being removed in my patch. > The AVR32 > header that is copied has a Digia copyright. Indeed, every file that > I looked at has > a Digia copyright. AVR32? OK, did you write this patch or did you just copied another header from Qt source and applied it to parisc? In case you have done the latest, did you modify anything? Please try to be as verbose as possible, it will certainly be the best for all of us :-D WRT copyright: if you substantially modify a file you also get a copyright right, except the changes are trivial or come from well defined data. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Super cow powers | bbq > /dev/stomach Traveler1, seen on #debian-ar, irc.oftc.net Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
