On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:10:39PM +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> I'm seeking the removal of pygrace and expeyes so that grace can be
> removed. CC'ing the relevant maintainers (and filing important bugs for
> each package). I expect the removal to start in two weeks unless I hear
> back about a viable solution.

If just getting standalone t1lib out of the archive is the goal, I don't mind
incorporating all of the existing t1lib patches into the embedded copy.  As
grace is almost exclusively used to plot locally-supplied numeric data, and is
not in any way practical to use in a network setting, it has minimal security
risk vs. some other former users of t1lib like php5.

If getting t1lib in all its forms out of the archive is the goal, then yes,
grace would have to be removed.  Rewriting it is not practical and there
doesn't seem to be anyone with the time + desire + skillset to adopt t1lib.
However, there's also no real replacement for grace itself available.


-- 
Nicholas Breen
nbr...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to