On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:12:08PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Source: edk2 > Version: 0~20131112.2590861a-2 > Severity: normal
> According to Debian Policy section 2.5: > Packages in the contrib or non-free archive areas should state in the > copyright file that the package is not part of the Debian distribution > and briefly explain why. I don't think I knew about this policy "should" (probably because I've managed to avoid maintaining contrib/non-free packages). Is there a recommended way to encode this in copyright-format-1.0? Should we clone this bug against policy, to codify this as part of the format? > As far as I can tell the edk2 copyright file doesn't state that parts of > it are non-free, which parts are non-free and why they are non-free. I > am guessing that it is due to the Intel-Fat-Driver license though. Correct. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
