Hi, I use this configuration because I like NM to manage my eth0 but I want to be able to attach qemu vm to bridge, so br0 starts witn no ports and this can make a difference.
Now I see NM can manage bridges so I wish to do tests. In short, this is extracted from my /etc/network/interfaces. # Bridge setup auto br0 iface br0 inet static address 10.10.25.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.10.25.255 hwaddress ether 62:aa:af:24:cf:8f #bridge_ports mac0 bridge_ports none # if you do not want to bind to any ports bridge_stp off # disable Spanning Tree Protocol bridge_waitport 0 # no delay before a port becomes available bridge_fd 0 # no forwarding delay bridge_ports regex eth* # use a regular expression to define ports up sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.br0.proxy_arp=1 Bye 2014-03-31 16:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>: > Am 31.03.2014 16:45, schrieb Leonardo: > > In my system I configured a bridge in /etc/network/interfaces so br0 > > inteface is listed in /run/network/ifstate. > > > > After removing the row br0=br0 from /run/network/ifstate I can start NM > > without segmentation fault. > > > > I suppose unmanaged interfaces conflicts with WM. > > I did test with an unmanaged interface wlan0 in /e/n/i and couldn't > reproduce the bug. I will try to see if the existence of a bridge config > makes a difference. Thanks for the hint. > > > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > >