severity 743817 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
On 2014-04-06 21:13, Marc Glisse wrote:
Package: libpoppler-dev
Version: 0.24.5-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
it is good that libpoppler44 is Multi-Arch: same (thanks), but it
would
be even better if the -dev packages were as well. libpoppler-dev has
all
its content in /usr/lib/$arch (except for changelog and copyright),
so
it seems really safe. The others should be as well, unless the
includes
or the gir file contain build-generated arch-specific data.
What's the use case for marking libpoppler-dev as m-a: same? Alone it
has no value in being so.
Some dependencies may not be multiarch yet (qtbase5-dev) but I don't
think it should prevent from marking libpoppler-qt5-dev (which would
then become co-installable automatically when qtbase5-dev is
updated),
and it doesn't concern libpoppler-dev.
- libqt4-dev (for libpoppler-qt4-dev) is not m-a: same safe
- qtbase5-dev (for libpoppler-qt5-dev) is not m-a: same safe
- libglib2.0-dev and the gir stuff (for libpoppler-glib-dev) are not
m-a: same safe
so it is pointless mark those -dev as m-a: same, for now.
--
Pino Toscano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
